Both of my morning classes take place just off an all-purpose room optimistically termed the 休息室 (relaxation room), where one can peruse a variety of Mandarin newspapers as well as the country's official English-language newspaper, the China Daily. Those in my cohort are not yet advanced enough to read much in Chinese newspapers (which, again, have their own style of language), but my classmates Wei Lian and Ding Ding have developed a habit of perusing the China Daily together during the break between our classes (I usually just sulk in the corner and lament my poor classroom performance). By peruse, I really do mean that they just leaf through, as there isn't much to be gleaned from news items like this:
Or hard-hitting editorials like this:
While these are mostly just facile, there are also many that make optimistic pro-China news items out of non-events;
Or misrepresent news items in the interest of the CCP:
In the case of this one I must call attention not only to the inaccurate image that people of Chinese descent the world over are rioting in the streets to bring Taiwan back into the tender arms of the motherland, but to the troublesome linguistic distinction that a country cannot actually secede from another with whom it has no diplomatic ties.Usually the only time I pay attention to the China Daily is when Wei Lian and Ding Ding find a real zinger of a headline, the kind that causes laughter and light consternation and to which our classmate Han Wei characteristically responds with a sing-song "mei you daoli" (没有道理 - literally - 'lacking in truth'). These articles are not so much outright falsehoods, but gross distortions based on extremely vague statements of supposed fact.

I really feel for the journalists behind these pieces, apparently required to create a headline which has little more to bolster it than the bold-faced quote: "The judicial reform process has been progressing smoothly". The body of the text contains another such quote from the garrulous Chief Justice Xiao:"The number of death sentences has been gradually decreasing and human rights are being better protected", Xiao told a national work conference on court reform, without elaborating.Because why would you need to elaborate on such on obvious statement of fact? Progress is progress, Socialism with Chinese Characteristics is the way forward, and all those tricky human rights issues and environmental catastrophes are pretty much going to work themselves out, right?
Of course I have selected only the most extreme examples from the last week, and much of the paper is actually composed of international articles taken from wire sources (but certainly cleared through some national authority) which exhibit no more or less truthiness than those you would find anywhere else. I think the thing that really gets me about the more farcical articles is that I just don't understand on whose behalf they are being produced. They must know that the English speaking readers of the paper are just going to chuckle at the empty places where news should be and go find contraband ways of reading the New York Times online, yet they obviously put a great deal of care into keeping up the appearance of vigilant indoctrination. So I suppose its just another wink, wink, nudge, nudge sort of a deal. You pretend to write the news and we'll pretend to read it.























